US Officer refuses to join Iraq illegal war

On June 22, 2006, U.S. Army 1st Lieutenant Ehren K. Watada stepped forward as the first commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the Iraq War and occupation. He faces court martial and up to 6 years imprisonment for refusing to deploy and for speaking out against a war that he believes is illegal.

Produced by David Rothmiller & Trick Dog Films, Inc.

In support of his courageous action, the Lt. Ehren Watada Campaign is working to educate and broaden the dialog on constitutional rights. The campaign is also involved with mobilizing grassroots action to insure that our government upholds Lt. Watada’s right to speak out and refuse to participate in illegal military action in Iraq.

Help us educate and mobilize others by signing the petition and making a donation to the Lt Watada defense fund.

More Videos

(Source: http://www.thankyoult.org/content/view/57/23/)

Workers abducted to build the US embassy in Iraq?

This type of news doesn’t surprise me anymore. We can expect anything from the Military-Industrial complex. Watch this YouTube video to hear the testimony of a man.

Big business calls the shots now

SILVER DONALD CAMERON

NOT LONG AGO an old friend e-mailed me, wondering why there is “so little media attention to the SPP?”

SPP? I responded. Whuzzat?

“Security and Prosperity Partnership with the U.S. and Mexico,” came the response.

That got me to digging around. And the SPP turned out to be a familiar old beast from the black lagoon, hydra-headed and slimy. SPP is the new name for the old American project of Manifest Destiny — absolute control over the whole continent.

The project has plenty of other names: NAFTA-Plus, Deep Integration, the North American Union. “North American Union” sounds groovy, sort of like the European Union. But the EU is an assembly of 27 mid-sized animals, while the NAU would be a union of two mice and an elephant.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership is largely the child of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, which is about as “Canadian” as the National Hockey League. Members include such maple-draped beavers as General Electric, General Motors, Fedex, Microsoft, Mitsubishi, Pratt and Whitney and Shell — all with the word “Canada” appended.

The Canadian Council of Collaborators might be a better name. The Canadian Council of Chief Executives is the local chapter of the international capitalist conspiracy, and like the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and others, its mission is to eliminate any impediments to the ability of international capital to make money whenever and wherever it likes. National boundaries are just another impediment, along with labour unions, minimum wages, environmental regulations and consumer protections.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership has its roots in 9-11, which forced the American-Canadian border to close for a short time. Former American ambassador Paul Cellucci later commented that the new U.S. attitude toward its borders was that “security trumps trade.” To keep the border open for trade, Canadian Council of Chief Executives president Tom d’Aquino proposed “more fundamental harmonization and integration” with the U.S.

Fifteen months later, the council announced a North American Security and Prosperity Initiative. It wanted a “new deal” — shared defence and security, and a comprehensive agreement on agriculture, metal, minerals and energy. Soon afterward, the council created a 30-member CEO Action Group to advance that agenda.

Next, the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations set up a tri-national Independent Task Force on the Future of North America, co-chaired by former finance minister John Manley and vice-chaired by d’Aquino. In March 2005, the task force reported, calling for a continental security perimeter, a common external tariff, a common border pass and a North American energy and natural resources strategy. Same agenda. And it wanted this done by 2010.

A group of people inside a common border, with a common tariff and a common passport, protected by a common defence force and sharing the natural wealth of the continent — that’s effectively one country, not three.

Visit Silver Donald Cameron’s website at www.silverdonaldcameron.ca

More at:
http://thechronicleherald.ca:80/NovaScotian/850197.html

(Source: http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20070730015244796)

Call to action from G. Edward Griffin & Aaron Russo

CALL TO ACTION FROM G. EDWARD GRIFFIN & AARON RUSSO

Posted By: DrRobinFalkov <Send E-Mail>
Date: Monday, 23 July 2007, 8:39 p.m.

Hello Everyone,

Please pay careful attention to what is written below in this alert by G. Edward Griffin and Aaron Russo to give you the necessary warning to protect yourselves.

The groundwork has been laid to critically damage those who disagree with this administration. This means potential loss of property, investments and more, if the government feels you to be a threat to the stabilization of Iraq.

It’s time to get to know your neighbors. Build community, have support groups. BE PREPARED!

ACT NOW TO PROTECT YOUR HEALTH FREEDOM RIGHTS, ALL YOUR RIGHTS. THE LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN!

Dr. Robin Falkov
www.healthfreedomrights.com

Cutting Edge Technology
www.lifewave.com/drrobinfalkov

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Freedom Force International

Call-to-Action

From: G. Edward Griffin and Aaron Russo

On July 17, President Bush signed an Executive order that authorized blocking the use of any property held by anyone he says is a threat to the “stabilization” of Iraq. That means anyone who opposes his Middle East foreign policy now is subject to loss of home, automobiles, savings, investments, and anything else considered as property. Read the document here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html.

This is about as serious as it gets. There have been many assaults on our freedom in the last few years, but none with such totality and finality as this. We must draw the line in the sand on this issue. The American people must re-discover their indignation, get off their couches, and send a tsunami of protest to Washington. Here are three things you can do:

1. If you don’t already know the name and contact information of you Congressman and Senator, look it up in Google. Send them a short but explicit message to the effect that you expect them to (1) introduce or support fast-track legislation to rescind the Executive Order issued July 17 relating to blocking property of those who disagree with President Bush’s policy in Iraq and (2) call for impeachment of the President NOW.

2. Make a list of every organization, publication, journalist, web site, talk-show host, and community leader who understands the significance of this Executive Order and send it to us at ge.griffin@verizon.net so we can build a coalition of activists on this issue. Also send them a note or call them in person to urge them to align with the coalition and take action.

3. Send this message to everyone you know.

That’s it. There is no need to explain why this is important, and there is nothing that can be said that would be more motivating than the stark possibility of a police state in which citizens loose their property if they disagree with der Fuhrer (the Leader).

Drop everything else and do this NOW.

G. Edward Griffin and Aaron Russo

You may also contact us via phone at 800-595-6596 or via mail at 3541 Old Conejo Road #109, Newbury Park, CA 91320.

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq

Like if the Patriot Act was not enough. He is making new laws on demand, without congressional oversight? This is getting out of hand…

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

…

(Full article: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html)

TOP SECRET" U.S MILITARY DOCUMENT DECLARES EXISTENCE OF "DOMESTIC INSURGENCY" INSIDE UNITED STATES

PLAN OUTLINES GOVERNMENT INTENT TO USE MILITARY FORCE AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS OVER POLITICAL ISSUES!

DESCRIBES USING PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS, OUTRIGHT MILITARY FORCE AND MEDIA PROPAGANDA AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS

By: Hal Turner

North Bergen, NJ — As a radio talk show host, I receive a whole slew of e-mail and regular mail about virtually every issue under the sun. Much of it gets deleted or thrown away. Some of it results in stories appearing on my web site or being discussed on my show. Every once in awhile, something akin to a bombshell arrives and yesterday, July 18, 2007 was one such day.

I came into possession of portions of a U.S. military plan which was allegedly classified “Top Secret.” This put me in a bind because without having a security clearance myself, having something which is Classified is unlawful. Reading such a document is also unlawful and revealing it to the public is definietly unlawful. So, I thought about it. I decided screw it, I’m going to read it.

As I read the document, my blood ran cold. Chills ran up my spine. The hair on the back of my neck stood up. My gut started churning. This document is an operational plan to use U.S. military troops against U.S. Citizens!

The plan says “A perceived serious potential of dissident American groups rising up against constituted authority has been clearly identified by counter-intelligence agencies.[Underlining mine]

The plan goes on to say why people are clearly thinking of rising up and throwing-off our federal government by saying “The stated cause for such an uprising appear to be growing dissatisfaction with the course and conduct of the war in Iraq, the chronic inability of Congress to deal with various pressing issues and the perception of widespread corruption and indifference to public needs.”

Sounds accurate to me. In fact, it describes perfectly reasonable justification for the America people to utilize our original right of self-defense against such a government or for us to impose reform!

Most stunning about the plan is that it talks about political reform and offers an unbelievably out-of-touch, completely un-American observation: “Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state . . . “

A matter for the state? We The People ARE the state. We The People decide on reform. For this U.S. military plan to assert “Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state” is like reading something out of the old Soviet Union! What planet are these people on?

The truly chilling parts of this plan involve the use of “Informant nets” of Americans literally spying on their fellow citizens and “Block Control” where the plan calls for “trusted resident reports on the activities of people in their neighborhoods.” Folks, this is what Fidel Castro does in Communist Cuba!

As you read the details below, remember this: This plan has been drawn up by OUR military. The military WE hired, WE train, WE equip, WE feed, WE clothe, WE house. It is an OUTRAGE that anyone in our military would DARE to even create such plan, nevermind try to implement it!

A Blunt warning to our Government and our Military:
In our nation of 300 million people, there are at least 95 million lawful gun owners. Those 95 million guns owners lawfully possess 212 million firearms.

Even if the government recalled ALL military members from around the entire world, they would have a force of only about two million.

95 million gun owners versus 2 million troops. I think we all know how this would turn out: the government would be slaughtered.

In fact, if only ten percent of the 95 million gun owners had guts enough to fight, we would still outnumber the military almost 3:1.

We The People of the United States aren’t the least bit worried about government tanks and planes, those tools are useless in guerilla warfare. Want proof? Iraq! The U.S. government is getting its ass kicked over there. Government wouldn’t last a week if they tried implenting this plan here.

Government would do well to remember they exist at the whim and behest of the American people. Government in this land exists to serve us as we direct.

The power government wields belongs to The People. We The People merely LEND part of our power to government and we have the absolute right to take that power back at any time we deem appropriate. In fact, the founding fathers made clear we can take it back in any MANNER we deem appropriate! That’s why they gave us the Second Amendment!

If the U.S. government or military dares attempt to implement this plan, they should expect to be killed.

PRECIS OF THE PLAN

Classification: Top Secret-Noforn as of 1 June 2007

Distribution Restriction: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to maintain operations security. This determination was made on 1 June 2007. Other requests for this document must be referred to (redacted)

Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. .

This publication uses the term insurgent to describe those taking part in any activity designed to undermine or to overthrow the established authorities

Counterinsurgency is those military, paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civicactions taken by a government to defeat insurgency (JP 1-02). It is an offensive approach involving all elements of national power; it can take place across the range of operations and spectrum of conflict

In dealing with the local populace, the primary aims must be to:

• Protect the population.
• Establish local political institutions.
• Reinforce local governments.
• Eliminate insurgent capabilities.
• Exploit information from local sources.

An insurgency is organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict (JP 1-02). It is a protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control. Political power is the central issue in an insurgency.

An insurgent organization normally consists of four elements:

• Leadership.
• Combatants (main forces, regional forces, local forces).
• Cadre (local political leaders that are also called the militants).
• Mass base (the bulk of the membership).

The support of the people, passive or active then, is the center of gravity. It must be gained in whatever proportion is necessary to sustain the insurgent movement (or, contrariwise, to defeat it). As in any political campaign, all levels of support are relative.

Insurgent movements begin as “fire in the minds of men.” Insurgent leaders commit themselves to building a new world. They construct the organization to carry through this desire. Generally, popular grievances become insurgent causes when interpreted and shaped by the insurgent leadership. The insurgency grows if the cadre that is local insurgent leaders and representatives can establish a link between the insurgent movement and the desire for solutions to grievances sought by the local population

Insurgent leaders will exploit opportunities created by government security force actions. The behavior of security forces is critical. Lack of security force discipline leads to alienation, and security force abuse of the populace is a very effective insurgent recruiting tool. Consequently, specific insurgent tactical actions are often planned to frequently elicit overreaction from security force individuals and units.

Insurgencies are dynamic political movements, resulting from real or perceived grievance or neglect that leads to alienation from an established government.

A successful counterinsurgency will result in the neutralization by the state of the insurgency and its effort to form a counterstate. While many abortive insurgencies are defeated by military and police actions alone, if an insurgency has tapped into serious grievances and has mobilized a significant portion of the population, simply returning to the status quo may not be an option. Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state, using all of its human and material resources. Security forces are only one such resource. The response must be multifaceted and coordinated, yet states typically charge their security forces with “waging counterinsurgency.” This the security forces cannot do alone.

These imperatives are:

• Facilitate establishment or reestablishment of a ‘legitimate government’.
• Counterinsurgency requires perseverance.
• Foster popular support for the incumbent US government.
• Prepare to perform functions and conduct operations that are outside normal scope of training.
• Coordinate with US governmental departments and agencies, and with vital non-governmental, agencies.

Urban operations.

• Protection of government facilities.
• Protection of infrastructure.
• Protection of commercial enterprises vital to the HN economy.
• Protection of cultural facilities.
• Prevention of looting.
• Military police functions.
• Close interaction with civilians.
• Assistance with reconstruction projects.
• Securing the national borders.
• Training or retraining a national military police and security force.

Establishing and maintaining local government credibility.

• Contributing local government is both tangible and psychological. Local security forces must reinforce and be integrated into the plan at every stage.
• Facilitate and use information and intelligence obtained from local sources to gain access to the insurgent’s economic and social base of support, order of battle, tactics, techniques, and procedures.

Army forces help local pro-government police, paramilitary, and military forces perform counterinsurgency, area security, or local security operations. They advise and assist in finding, dispersing, capturing, and destroying the insurgent force.

US forces may conduct offensive operations to disrupt and destroy insurgent combat formations. These operations prevent the insurgents from attacking government-controlled areas.

There are many organizations and extensive resources available to aid counterinsurgent forces.

Commanders should not overlook the aid these organizations may provide. All forces assigned an AO or function should determine which departments and agencies are assisting in that AO and coordinate actions so that there is no duplication of effort. Such departments, councils and agencies include:

• National Security Council.
• Department of Defense.
• Department of State.
• Department of Justice.
• Department of the Treasury.
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Department of Agriculture.
• Department of Commerce.
• Central Intelligence Agency.
• Department of Transportation

Various governmental departments directly administer or support other governmental agencies. Examples of these US agencies are-

• The US Coast Guard (under Department of Homeland Security).
• The Federal Bureau of Investigation (under Department of Justice).
• Immigration Customs Enforcement (under Department of Homeland Security).
• Federal Communications Commission

The proper application of force is a critical component to any successful counterinsurgency operation. In a counterinsurgency, the center of gravity is public support. In order to defeat an insurgent force, US forces must be able to separate insurgents from the population. At the same time, US forces must conduct themselves in a manner that enables them to maintain popular domestic support. Excessive or indiscriminant use of force is likely to alienate the local populace, thereby increasing support for insurgent forces. Insufficient use of force results in increased risks to US forces and perceived weaknesses that can jeopardize the mission by emboldening insurgents and undermining domestic popular support. Achieving the appropriate balance requires a thorough understanding of the nature and causes of the insurgency, the end state, and the military’s role in a counterinsurgency operation. Nevertheless, US forces always retain the right to use necessary and proportional force for individual and unit self-defense in response to a hostile act or demonstrated hostile intent.

The media, print and broadcast (radio, television and the Internet), play a vital role in societies involved in a counterinsurgency. Members of the media have a significant influence and shaping impact on political direction, national security objectives, and policy and national will. The media is a factor in military operations. It is their right and obligation to report to their respective audiences on the use of military force. They demand logistic support and access to military operations while refusing to be controlled. Their desire for immediate footage and on-the-spot coverage of events, and the increasing contact with units and Soldiers (for example, with embedded reporters) require commanders and public affairs officers to provide guidance to leaders and Soldiers on media relations. However, military planners must provide and enforce ground rules to the media to ensure operations security. Public affairs offices plan for daily briefings and a special briefing after each significant event because the media affect and influence each potential target audience external and internal to the AO. Speaking with the media in a forward-deployed area is an opportunity to explain what our organizations and efforts have accomplished.

Continuous PSYOP are mounted to:

• Counter the effects of insurgent propaganda.
• Relate controls to the security and well-being of the population.
• Portray a favorable governmental image.

Control measures must:

• Be authorized by national laws and regulations (counterparts should be trained not to improvise unauthorized measures).
• Be tailored to fit the situation (apply the minimum force required to achieve the de-sired result).
• Be supported by effective local intelligence.
• Be instituted in as wide an area as possible to prevent bypass or evasion.
• Be supported by good communications.
• Be enforceable.
• Be lifted as the need diminishes.Be compatible, where possible, with local customs and traditions.
• Establish and maintain credibility of local government.

A control program may be developed in five phases:

• Securing and defending the area internally and externally.
• Organizing for law enforcement.
• Executing cordon and search operations.
• Screening and documenting the population (performing a detailed census).
• Performing public administration, to include resource control.

Support to the judiciary may be limited to providing security to the existing courts or may lead to more comprehensive actions to build local, regional, and national courts and the required support apparatus. To avoid overcrowding in police jails, the courts must have an efficient and timely magistrate capability, ideally co-located with police stations and police jails, to review cases for trial.

Cordon and search is a technique used by military and police forces in both urban and rural environments. It is frequently used by counterinsurgency forces conducting a population and resource control mission against small centers of population or subdivisions of a larger community. To be effective, cordon and search operations must have sufficient forces to effectively cordon off and thoroughly search target areas, to include subsurface areas.

PSYOP, civil affairs, and specialist interrogation teams should augment cordon and search orces to increase the effectiveness of operations. Consider the following when conducting cordon and search operations:

Cordon and search operations may be conducted as follows:

Disposition of troops should:

• Facilitate visual contact between posts within the cordon.
• Provide for adequate patrolling and immediate deployment of an effective re-serve force.

Priority should be given to:

• Sealing the administrative center of the community.
• Occupying all critical facilities.
• Detaining personnel in place.
• Preserving and securing all records, files, and other archives.

Key facilities include:

• Administrative buildings.
• Police stations.
• News media facilities.
• Post offices.
• Communications centers.

Transportation offices and motor pools.

• Prisons and other places of detention.
• Schools.
• Medical facilities.

Search Techniques include:

• Search teams of squad size organized in assault, support, and security elements.

One target is assigned per team:

• Room searches are conducted by two-person teams.
• Room search teams are armed with pistols, assault weapons, and automatic weapons.
• Providing security for search teams screening operations and facilities.

Pre-search coordination includes:

• Between control personnel and screening team leaders.
• Study of layout plans.
• Communications, that is, radio, whistle, and hand signals.
• Disposition of suspects.
• On-site security.
• Guard entrances, exits (to include the roof), halls, corridors, and tunnels.
• Assign contingency tasks for reserve.
• Room searches conducted by two- or three-person teams.
• Immobilize occupants with one team member.
• Search room with other team member.
• Search all occupants. When available, a third team member should be the re-corder.
• Place documents in a numbered envelope and tag the associated individual with a corresponding number.

SCREENING AND DOCUMENTING THE POPULATION

Screening and documentation include following:

• Systematic identification and registration.
• Issuance of individual identification cards containing:

• A unique number.
• Picture of individual.
• Personal identification data.
• Fingerprints.
• An official stamp (use different colors for each administration region).

Family group census cards, an official copy of which is retained at the local po-lice agency. These must include a picture and appropriate personal data.

Frequent use of mobile and fixed checkpoints for inspection, identification, and reg-istration of documents.

Preventing counterfeiting of identification and registration documents by laminat-ing and embossing.

Programs to inform the population of the need for identification and registration.

Covert surveillance is a collection effort with the responsibility fixed at the intelligence/security division or detective division of the police department. Covert techniques, ranging from application of sophisticated electronics systems to informants, should include-

Informant nets. Reliability of informants should be verified. Protection of identity is a must.

Block control. Dividing a community or populated area into zones where a trusted resident reports on the activities of the population. If the loyalty of block leaders is questionable, an informant net can be established to verify questionable areas.

Units designated for counterinsurgency operations:

• 115th MIB, Schofield, HI
• 704th MIB, Fort Made, MD, Collaboration with NSA
• 513st MIB, Fort Gordon, GA in Collaboration with NSA
• Arlington Hall Station, VA
• Aberdeen Proving Ground (Maryland)
• US Army Intelligence and Security Command ­ INSCOM- Huachuca ( Arizona )
• INTELLIGENCE THREAT and ANALYSIS CENTER ( Center Analysis for threat and Intelligence )
• 501st Military Intelligence Brigade EAC
• 3rd Military Intelligence Battalion Exploitation Area

…The document continues, page after page, throughout almost nine-hundred pages. In those other pages, the document outlines “REX 84″ “FEMA concentration camps”, already established, constructed and manned inside the United States, to be utilized to house “insurgents” who are rounded-up by government.

Conclusions

When I read the document, I knew that I could be criminally prosecuted for having it, prosecuted on a separate charge for reading it and prosecuted yet again for releasing information contained within it.

I decided that the threat to Liberty posed by the document made it imperative that I take action and I have done so. Now, all of you know!

I also realized that in order for the U.S. Government to prosecute me, the document would have to be authentic. They would have to admit the Document is authentic and actually Classified in order to bring any prosecution.

Since such an admission would prove me right and be an ominous warning to all of you that real trouble is here, I suspect I am safe from any reprisals for the time being. It’s a gamble with enormous consequences, but saving our Republic from a tyrannical government is worth my risk.

It is clear to me that very serious things are on the horizon here in America. It will be up to us, citizen-patriots, to step up to defend our liberty. I am ready. Are you?

– Hal Turner
http://www.HalTurnerShow.com

I will be making comments on this release later today.

The Government and the Press Win Their Arguments By Ignoring Courtroom Evidence

Lyle Michel Writes:
“ To many people assume because some information in a story is wrong or misleading that the whole story is false. This is often not the case.

Almost all stories regarding the UFO community stories include some disinformation. It is how black operations maintains their control.

I don’t know whether the Serpo story is true or not, but I do know that black opeations will purpposely do things like claim their were 12 people when their were only 8 or whatever the number. Unless your willing to look at any story regarding the phenomena as if you are sitting on a jury you will be in a constant state of confusion. Your chances are better at the slot win mega bucks here in Las Vegas than ever understanding the extraterrestrial phenomena.

Once again this is a write up that I sent out previously regarding how the press and the government manipulate the truth. If you understand this it will be very difficult to confuse you about the truth on most extraterrestrial issues.”

Lyle Michel

The Government and the Press Win Their Arguments By Ignoring Courtroom Evidence About Abductees and The Extraterrestrial Phenomena by Lyle Michel (Copyright 2006, Lyle Michel) Posted: 13:00 December 6, 2006 Scene from Steven Spielberg’s Taken: a serious look at the alien abduction phenonomen. The government and the press with single-mindedness use one basic premise to confuse people regarding the presence of beings from other planets coming to earth. They ignore courtroom evidence. Evidence according to a legal dictionary is: “… all the means by which any alleged matter of fact, the truth of which is submitted to investigation at judicial trial, is established or disapproved. Evidence includes the testimony of witnesses, introduction of records, documents, exhibits or any other relevant matter offered for the purpose of inducing the trier of the facts (fact finder’s) belief in the party’s contention”. In other words eyewitness testimony and physical evidence related to the incident being studied is admissible as proof that the incident did occur in the manner described. It is important to understand that the position taken by the government and the press has nothing to do with the reality of the extraterrestrial phenomena. In other words they know that beings from other planets are routinely visiting earth and that some species walk among us. Therefore, why do the press and the government work so hard to keep people confused about beings from other planets coming to earth? The government keeps people confused because they feel that the people of the world could not or would not be able to deal with the truth. As happened with the 1938 radio broadcast of The War of the Worlds” many people would panic and chaos would result if people knew the truth. In this case any risk is an unnecessary risk. Better to keep the people confused. On the extraterrestrial issue the position of the press is in part to support the government. The press realizes that if they consistently presented only truths to the people of earth that the result would be massive demonstrations against the institutions, which we require for leadership. Note that I said, in part, they support the government. They also know that our system of government would not be able to survive without the people knowing the truth on all the most important issues. Therefore, their method of handling virtually all controversial issues is to tell the people the truth and then to present alternative opinions regardless of how untruthful or silly these alternative opinions happen to be. This source and method is used extensively by the press to support the government as well as educate the public regarding the truth on all issues of importance to the people of the earth. There are few exceptions to this practice by the press. To illustrate this point lets consider the issue of an extraterrestrial abductee. A person abducted by the extraterrestrials may have near total recall of their experiences with them. Jim Sparks can attest to that. He can describe in great detail the appearance of the craft and the beings who abducted him. He can also reflect with authority his experiences with them. There is no doubt that Jim Sparks has detailed knowledge of his experiences with beings from other planets. In my opinion he has no motivation to be less than truthful. His first hand accounts are admissible in a court of law should our government require his testimony. All you have to do is look at his presentation from the point of view of being in a courtroom with the reader as a member of the jury evaluating his case. By examining the extraterrestrial phenomena in this manner you will begin the process of separating fact from fiction as presented by our government and the press. I have been a student of the extraterrestrial phenomena since 1991. The first 7 years of information came completely from television and an occasional newspaper article. Many of the programs on the Discovery Channel, A & E Channel, The History Channel and Sci-Fi Channel contain significant truths about our alien visitors. These programs also frequently contain disinformation in order to give others a reason to disregard the fact that beings are coming to earth from other planets. They often present their information in this manner purposely to help those who cannot deal with the truth adjust to the fact that alien visitors are coming to earth. In other words those who are afraid of the truth are given an opportunity to stay in denial of this truth until they are ready to adjust to the facts in the case. Here you have it in an abbreviated form. The corner stone of the government position is: a.) To deny and exercise the premises of decoy, destruction and trash. b.) Never admit to the truth! c.) Whenever possible introduce additional information that will confuse anyone interested in the phenomena. d.) Make things up. For example, simply say the event didn’t happen. The witness could not have been with the extraterrestrials he was at the movies. The witness was visiting relatives. The witness is delusional. It doesn’t matter that none of these statements are true. People who are not experienced with how they are being manipulated will be so confused about the other possibilities to the courtroom evidence supplied by the witness that they will simply go on about their daily activities as if the story they were told was not true. Remember the key to success for the government is to ignore courtroom type evidence. Clearly beings from other planets are coming to earth. Some are here to visit. In other words they are tourist. Some are here as scientist. They are here to study our civilization. Some are here to help us. They work among us and help us invent things that they know we will find useful. They are helping us to absorb technology at a pace that is comfortable for our civilization. They are helping us to become a sustainable civilization. They want us to one day join their galactic federation. Several years ago I had the privilege to spend a year taking a course titled, A Course In Miracles from a minister of the Unity Church. I learned a number of important lessons in this course, but one of the most important was that there are universal truths. The mere fact that we do not know or understand something does not change the facts in the case. Beings similar to us are coming to earth and are among us. Your decision to believe that this statement is not true will not change the fact that they are here and have been for a very long time. Click on the link to get your own copy of Jim Sparks’ The Keepers: An Alien Message for the Human Race