Drone UFO on Fox News

I can assure you, if these videos and photos contain real objects, they aren’t extraterrestrials. I’ve never seen such clumsy and weird designs. Purely out of a movie studio. A lot of the pictures on this video look like CGI. It has some entertaining values. But who knows…

The biggest pain in the back for serious ET researchers

There’s No Law Against Flying a Super-Double-Secret, Gyroscoptic UFO

51-year-old Irvine man named Linn Murphy has a strange hobby: the hoaxster likes to fly a homemade radio-controlled “UFO” over parks and public events which caused hundreds if not thousands of calls to the police!

Now, the jig is up:

[The UFO inventor, Steve Zingali] built one anyway. It flew, but couldn’t handle the wind. So he tweaked a few things and doubled its span from 18 to 36 inches. A phenomenon was born. Soon, Orange County motorists were chasing strange lights in the sky. Orange County’s Mutual UFO Network was taking calls about erratic, flying objects. And the Web site UFOinfo.com was posting reports of “glowing orbs” in south Orange County.

One 53-year-old man reported a large glowing ball that “appeared to drip fire.” It traveled about five miles in a few seconds, he said, and left an “acrid type odor” in the air.

Where? Right here. Right where Zingali is now connecting a 7.4-volt lithium battery to a foam toy with flashing lights that make it appear to spin. He starts the propeller and sends it into the night sky above the Aliso Viejo Town Center.

Voices rise as quickly as the UFO: “Oh my God.” … “UFO.” Shoppers gallop up the hill, including Haywood Bagley, who told his wife: “I hope they don’t start shooting. If I go down, you get in the car, Baby.”

The police, to their credit, thought Linn and Zingali’s shenanigans were kind of cool:

“We’ve had strange calls – people reporting UFOs and strange sounds in the air,” says Lt. Rich Paddock, police chief for Aliso Viejo. “But they’re not doing anything illegal. There’s no ordinance that says it’s illegal to fly a super-double-secret, gyroscoptic UFO in county airspace.”

(Source: http://www.neatorama.com)

Now this gotta be annoying. Why would someone do this, just to piss off people…?

Thank god, we have methods to verify who’s driving those objects in the sky! Ot at least, that there is intelligence controlling those.

Haiti video comfirmed to be CGI

Update and confirmation of CGI. These videos are a good test for the population in fact. Been able to see what CGI/ARV looks like and the real thing is great.

Why does Coast to Coast bothers to show these…

At first glance, this is Computer Animated Graphics.
My feeling is it is not of ET Origin. Too many dents and cracks and misplaced lights.
Looks like material for a good movie. But not objects created by highly spiritial beings.

Real ET craft will use more geometrical shapes, at it’s simplest form… Straight to the point and efficient.
The video seen here show clunky and cumbersome craft…
Now why do they even bother showing this. They seem to be rendered with the same technique the famous drones were.

Debunking the drones

Submitted by Terry G

Recent sightings of the so-called ‘Drones’ has prompted widespread speculation on internet forums and a flurry of news reports from within the UFO community from websites and in major media outlets. Very clear photographs of the drones have reportedly come from multiple different sources, centering around the Lake Tahoe area allegedly going as far back as 1995, but with no proof to that effect. The drones appear in several different configurations, normally characterized by a large hair-like array on top, and what appear to be large booms protruding from the sides of the craft, complete with strange writing on the exterior.The drones are a hoax. This case is reminiscent of the Billy Meier hoaxed photographs and film footage. There is no substantial proof or credibility offered in either case, and these photographs upon first glance are even more phony in general appearance than the majority of Meier’s. For instance, the drone craft appears similar to a ceiling fan with an eggbeater on top, not very convincing even to the the earnest UFO believer when compared to past, more legitimate, mass sightings of black triangles and discs. We live in the post-Photoshop world, which has proven painful for the UFO field. Anyone can hoax a UFO photograph with knowledge of Photoshop, basic camera work and editing, or CGI movie making abilities.

It is imperative in light of these techniques to keep an objective viewpoint when analyzing photographs and video footage of UFO’s. At the Paranormal report, we certainly believe that some UFO’s appear to represent a superior intelligence of unknown, perhaps extraterrestrial origin, but this does not seem to be the case with the drone UFO’s. MUFON field investigators have already very convincingly debunked the photographs as being CGI generated, but it seems to be deeper than just a good old fashioned hoax.The case has been linked to the CARET (Commercial Applications Research for Extra-terrestrial Technology) documents that have been surfacing recently from an anonymous source named ‘Isaac’. Without getting into the problems inherent in anonymous sources releasing unverified documents, even this source claims that he is not familiar with the craft as a whole, but only sees similarities in the style of writing on the drone aircraft to that which he claims to have worked with in the 1980′s. This is not silver bullet cooroboration of evidence as some have claimed, it is simply an association about how the writing looks from an anonymous releaser of unproven, very new and not yet well scrutinized documents.

(Source: http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/viewnews.php?id=99485)
(Original: http://www.theparanormalreport.com)

Did some of you get fooled by this whole story?

I hope that people will have learn a lesson from this. Computer Graphics are getting better every day and this is just a beginning. What makes me sad is that Coast to Coast got involved with this.