CNN Covers Elites Depopulation Program

I hate to bring this up to you guys. But information is sometimes depressing sometime I hope, source of motivation and desire for change and action.

With the technology black shelved already in vast labs and warehouses and with changes in our lifestyles, we could accommodate 15 billion people on this planet. Look at africa alone, imagine if it was to flourish again, with the use of terraforming…

Gardens and fields and forest all over the deserts…

We don’t need depopulation, we need the technology to start irrigating desert and generate free energy.

CNN report UFO conference 12 november 2007

Former Governor Admits Reality of Phoenix Lights

Governor of Arizona 10 years ago, Fife Symington reveals on CNN that he accepts the reality of the Phoenix Lights phenomena of 13th of March 1997. Back then Fife laughed the event off, and insulted the people that were asking serious questions, by bringing a man in an alien suit to his press conference. On 17th of March 2007, the former governor admits that he lied ten years ago to prevent public panic.

At last a politician that has the guts and decency to admit he has lied to the people!

(Source: http://ufowatcher.blogspot.com)

ABC News Morphs into CNN While Doing Piece

“Out of The Blue”

By Frank Warren

Not surprisingly, and following the “mainstream press pattern, ABC News, specifically “Nightline” delivered a disappointing segment on UFOs, and in particular, the “updated version” (5th anniversary) of the documentary, “Out of The Blue” last night (Friday July 6th).

Not unlike its rival, CNN, the reporting done primarily by Brian Rooney was poor, and misleading; however, they did omit the “Sci-Fi theme music” (e.g., The Outer Limits) which I suppose is a plus given how the networks (and CNN) “handle” the subject.

Much like the Peter Jennings show, “Seeing is Believing” done a couple of years back, the news segment started out well; it began with Dr. Frank Drake (in a classroom setting, in front of a chalkboard) explaining the “Drake Equation” which calculates the number of worlds that may harbor intelligent life; this was followed by witnesses of the Phoenix Lights sighting of ’97, beginning with good friend and colleague Mike Fortson.

It was all down hill from there in my view; although there were moments of clarity, as the producers continued to show snippets of the documentary. The questions posed by Brian Rooney intimated that the subject of UFOs was either “faith based,” fodder for the “mentally challenged” or possibly some “grand conspiratorial hoax!”

Professional skeptic Michael Shermer was enlisted to offer the “contrasting view” (apparently) and for me “broke the monotony,” as it evoked laughter; piteously he actually believes what he says. Shermer took eye witness accounts of astronauts, police officers or politicians like Jimmy Carter bundled them up and discarded them, saying, “it’s irrelevant . . . because they’re human and they’re brains and nervous systems and sensory apparatus are structured just like the average Joes.”

Can you imagine an attorney in a murder case standing up in court using that defense? Apparently, Shermer would have the viewer believer that the credibility of witnesses is dependent upon “just what they saw.” If they saw a plane then “their respective neurons are firing properly”; however, inject a UFO into the mix, and perhaps their “sensory apparatus” is flawed somehow! Ad Nauseum!

Although Shermer talked about “science” stating, “The, uh, the story is well told and well produced. But that’s not how science works. In science we have to have some way of testing to get an answer. It’s this or this. And we have to have some way of weighing the evidence.” He continues by saying, “UFO sightings, even the most interesting ones, tend to share similar characteristics. There are no pictures, or the pictures are blurry. Or maybe there are pictures, but they disappeared into government archives never to be seen again.”

Shermer fails to point out (and Rooney doesn’t question) the fact that the UFO phenomenon is “transitory”; because the task of acquiring scientific evidence is difficult under these circumstances, it doesn’t mean it’s impossible, or that it doesn’t exist as Shermer might have the viewer believe!

The dialogue left the viewer thinking that Ufology is supported by nothing more then “questionable witnesses and or blurry pictures.” Nothing was said about the 20 years of investigation done by the U.S. Air Force” or the fact that some of the greatest minds of the last century were tasked “secretly” to investigate the phenomenon; many who would become “Nobel Laureates!” “Physical trace cases” weren’t mentioned, nor “radar/visual sightings.” The fact that every intelligence agency as well as every branch of the military has files on UFOs was also precluded.

That truth that Congress has addressed the subject matter on more then one occasion, as well as it echoing through the halls of the U.N. was conveniently omitted!

The statistical study by the “Battelle Memorial Institute” (regarding UFO sightings) done for the Air Force was not mentioned; nor Project Blue Book’s Special Report No. 14. The formation of “The Robertson Panel” by the CIA, and the beginning of “governmental debunking” (based on the recommendation of the panel) was not discussed.

Suffice it to say, what was left out of the piece in regards to “validating Ufology” for the layperson was substantial! The questions asked, as well as the way they were asked, in addition to omission of much of the facts certainly influences the “collective mind-set of the viewers.”

This “pitiable reporting” by “the mainstream media” in regards to the “UFO Phenomenon” is very reminiscent of the reporting of erroneous data in the months following 911, which lead over 70% of the American public to “falsely believe” that Iraq had something to do with the attack.

The one encouraging (and ironic) aspect of the segment is that, given Nightline’s large audience, those that end up purchasing the documentary, “Out of The Blue” will get a more accurate, and illuminating report of the “UFO Phenomenon. “

Good work James Fox!

Out of the Blue

Visit Frank Warren’s website.

Mike’s Chat on HuffPost After CNN Showdown

Mike’s Chat on HuffPost After CNN Showdown

CNN Gets Blitzed by Michael Moore

Michael Moore: “The one expert you had in the piece is a person from a think tank group, who is a big Republican contributor, he’s done business with Blue Cross, with Aventis … don’t you have a right as a journalist, a responsibility actually, to tell the public when you’re using an expert: this person is a Republican, he’s with a think tank that’s connected to Tommy Thompson, you know…”

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: “His only affiliation is with Vanderbilt University. We checked it, Michael.”

‘SiCKO’ Truth Squad Sets the Record Straight:
CNN vs. THE FACTS
“If we get that confirmed, obviously, we’ll correct the record.” — Wolf Blitzer, live on The Situation Room

Michael Moore on Wolf Blitzer, Round II (VIDEO)

Commenting on the Commentaries

“Where can I see the film?” | “What can I do?“

M. Moore is literally on FIRE!!! I like the man. He’s got nerves.

Mike’s Chat on HuffPost After CNN Showdown

Mike’s Chat on HuffPost After CNN Showdown

CNN Gets Blitzed by Michael Moore

Michael Moore: “The one expert you had in the piece is a person from a think tank group, who is a big Republican contributor, he’s done business with Blue Cross, with Aventis … don’t you have a right as a journalist, a responsibility actually, to tell the public when you’re using an expert: this person is a Republican, he’s with a think tank that’s connected to Tommy Thompson, you know…”

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: “His only affiliation is with Vanderbilt University. We checked it, Michael.”

‘SiCKO’ Truth Squad Sets the Record Straight:
CNN vs. THE FACTS
“If we get that confirmed, obviously, we’ll correct the record.” — Wolf Blitzer, live on The Situation Room

Michael Moore on Wolf Blitzer, Round II (VIDEO)

Commenting on the Commentaries

“Where can I see the film?” | “What can I do?“

M. Moore is literally on FIRE!!! I like the man. He’s got nerves.

UFOs research work continues

by Joel de Woolfson

PILOT Ray Bowyer said his appearance on prime time TV had been a marvellous experience.

The Aurigny captain, who claimed to have spotted two huge UFOs off Alderney two months ago, explained the sightings on the Richard & Judy Show and CNN on Monday night.
Capt. Bowyer was quizzed about the incident by the couple and discovered that the objects he saw were similar to a UFO photographed in New Mexico, USA, in 1957.
He told the Channel Four couple that he was now working with Dr David Clark, a writer for the Fortean Times and lecturer at Sheffield Hallam University who appeared in the Guernsey Press last month, to try to discover more about the sightings.
‘That photo from New Mexico was surprisingly similar and Dr Clark will be looking into the similarities,’ he said.
Capt. Bowyer added that he was very well looked after on the two shows and claimed Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan were the same off-screen as they were on.
‘It was marvellous. I asked them if they would ever come to Guernsey to do a show and Judy said they have never been to the Channel Islands, so you never know.
‘CNN was a different experience because it’s just you talking to a TV camera, which is far less inspiring. But virtually every home in America has CNN so it went out to a significant amount of people.’
He also got the opportunity to meet comedian Ronnie Corbet, who was also appearing on Richard & Judy, and said he was a very pleasant man.
Capt. Bowyer is still researching the sightings and said he had had a very worthwhile trip to Jersey Radar.
‘I’m looking forward to getting some more information from the radar. The radar in Jersey was very informative.
‘There was the possibility that there were two objects on the radar in the same area for the same length of time.

‘We need to research it more but it was very large on the radar.’

(Source: http://www.thisisguernsey.com/code/shownewsarticle.pl?ArticleID=002349)